//
you're reading...
Taekwondo, Writing

Tony Blauer – It’s not who’s right, it’s who’s left


Combat magazine has a well-deserved reputation for speaking to market-leaders and finding out they have not only devised the system they teach, but also why they devised the systems.

Tony Blauer is one such market-leader and is the founder of the world-famous SPEAR™ system, as well as the inventor of the High Gear™ suit. Both SPEAR™ and the High Gear™ suit are revolutionising the world of martial arts. SPEAR™ is the most scientific self-protection system in the world and the High Gear™ suit is the most advanced form of body armour specifically designed with self-protection in mind, but is also taking the MMA world by storm as top athletes such as UFC veteran BJ Penn realise just how valuable it can be in training.

What is your original martial arts background?

I always answer that two ways. My original official martial art was ‘the Green Hornet’ – watching Bruce Lee in the Green Hornet when I was just a youngster and messing around with that stuff as an athlete.

“I was always strongly inspired by Bruce Lee, I was always eclectic”

Officially I started with Taekwondo. Prior to that I had wrestled extensively at school and competitively but it wasn’t until the UFC made grappling popular that I even considered that wrestling was some sort of martial art or part of my background.

You can see this on my DVD “Forging a Fighting System” where I’ve compiled training clips of my evolution over 20 years of training, drills and fighting. A training partner and I were sparring outside and had a video camera set up. He sucker punches me and there’s a quick exchange – we go into a truly primal clinch where we’re just bashing each other. I wrap him up and take him down, squish him and stack him on the ground whilst threatening to punch his head into the pavement. It’s all good fun – he’s bleeding and I’m stunned but it was that clinch grappling take down that stopped the fight.

Why did you start martial arts?

Well, I was always thinking about fighting on a logical and emotional level and always thinking about the self defence side of martial arts. I always had a lot of fear about what I would I do there, what would I do here. I interpreted this ‘thinking about fighting’ as “fear of fighting” and I just delved into these fear and fighting concepts in all their aspects. At the same time I was watching the Green Hornet and I was just infatuated with Bruce Lee; infatuated with the old ‘Wild, Wild West’ shows with Robert Conrad. Anytime there was a fight scene I’d go into zombie mode in front of the TV!

The philosophical answer is that if I look at my career, now at age 47, the things that I’ve participated in, some of the changes that I believe my research has helped inspire in combative, reality based training and self-defence, mean that clearly this was the path I was supposed to be on.

At what point did you realise that traditional martial arts weren’t offering you what you needed, rather than what you wanted?

I was always strongly inspired by Bruce Lee, I was always eclectic. I went to TKD because it was the only school in my community growing up as a teenager. I converted my basement into a gym and as a 13 year-old I would crank out 100 push ups, abs, do kicks, punches even before I brushed my teeth. I was pretty much a fanatic.

I went to school, came home from school, worked out and then went to TKD class. I was always kicking and punching and doing whatever. When I was 15 I started boxing as well because of course we all know that TKD is a kicking- based system so I wanted to work my hands more. Between the wrestling boxing and kicking I pretty much had most of the ranges covered.

The thing that really changed – and this was in 1979/80 – was when I started teaching and I would get all sorts of questions about ‘what would you do if this happened” and “what should I do here” and I really started looking at more specific self-defence models but still trained in that conventional modality – we would talk about self-defence and then we would go spar.

The big change happened when one of my students got his ass kicked in a self-defence situation. He came to a private lesson looking all dejected. I asked what happened and he had this bully situation at school but when I asked him what happened he told me that another kid had tripped him in school and, finally having had enough of this bully, my student grabbed him, pushed him against the locker bank and held him there out of frustration and said ‘I don’t even know you, why are you bugging me, just leave me alone!’

I asked what happened next and he said ‘he hit me with a left hook’. I asked him why he didn’t block it or jam it or bob and weave’, he paused and said ‘well because I was holding my school books.’

That’s when I had this big light bulb moment and thought ‘oh my god – we completely teach self-defence the wrong way’. These clichéd complex motor skill based answers – “here’s where you disarm a knife, here’s how you get out of a choke, here’s how you throw a guy” then we spar or we grapple but wait – real self-defence starts with an emotional psychological confrontation that affects how you think and how you feel. Both of those things affect the way you move and hence your tactics.

It was at that moment that I completely shifted and changed how I taught self-defence. Everything from then was scenario based and included a pre-contact verbal build-up with emotional and verbal distractions and happened at a distance that was entirely unfamiliar and uncomfortable, but where all fights start.

You say the SPEAR™ system is ‘genetically wired and behaviourally inspired’ but how did you examine the instinctive actions of people? Did you just have people react?

There’s a long list of things and the answer is probably longer than your magazine! It was a body of work. It’s not a single piece of research.

We are the only self-defence training company that has had medical reviews on its work. I think that that is a huge thing. In the UK, we had to have one of the leading medical research doctors sit in on our courses because our programme is deeply integrated into the UK’s Law Enforcement safety programme. The UK, being very professional in what they will embrace and what they will integrate, did years and years of evaluation on our methods before eventually integrating what we do. We’ve also had doctors in Canada and the US evaluate the SPEAR™ system and their findings are available to anyone who wants to see them.

When you started out you, were developing SPEAR™ as a civilian system, when did you realise that SPEAR™ has major implications for Law Enforcement Officers?

The interesting thing is that I was always just doing my own thing. I never pushed it to anyone. It was more of a Field of Dreams – “build it and they will come”. It was what I wanted to do and even today I’m coming up with new stuff. Last month I had some new drills. I don’t know of many companies who continually refine and innovate like this. In the beginning, my team around me, which has grown and grown, didn’t understand how we would get together every couple of months and I’d have changed a lesson plan, added a couple of drills and so on.

“That’s when I had this big light bulb moment and thought ‘oh my god – we completely teach self-defence the wrong way'”

They would get frustrated saying ‘why’s he checking up on us?’ That wasn’t the case – there was always room for improvement, always room for evolution, always a better way to explain something. We truly evolved. We’re not teaching some secret scroll stuff from the old days. We’re looking at current trends in violence and urban criminology, the body’s physiology and psychology and figuring out from there what best to do to enhance survivability.

What was the reception like in those days?

Ironically, the response is still the same from some people today! Back then no-one had heard about us, so it was like ‘who do you think you are, Bruce Lee’? We used to get that a lot because people didn’t look at the body of the work or what the intention was, they just looked at the label. The label was ‘new style, new system’ and when you ask anyone in this century about who invented a new system, they say Bruce Lee but in reality, all ‘traditional systems’ have been invented at some point, and continue to be re-invented today.

It was my students and myself that co-developed SPEAR™ into what it has become. For example, if I had always been teaching the Vulcan neck pinch and all of my students were able to grab the Trapezius muscle like Spock did in Star Trek and stop and subdue everybody – we wouldn’t be doing this interview because the work would have been completed.

You see, many people are looking for that secret, “one move” that will work 100% of the time. Well, we like to tell people that “everything works once – it won’t work twice” in the sense that, if there was just one move that worked, then somebody would have found it by now and the martial arts world would have gravitated towards it, and stopped!

So we did confrontations and scenarios that evolved our work and, being a deliberately philosophical and introspective scientist of sorts, I would always look at things deeply and I’m a voracious reader. Before we did anything, I’d always say ‘lets think about this, what could also happen, what would be the Murphy Moment here, wouldn’t it suck if this happened’ or ‘okay that’s great, in a vacuum we’ll do this, but real life doesn’t function in a vacuum’.

This wasn’t for everybody, we had people leaving the school and there were people at seminars who would get upset – I’d talk for 3.5 hours and drill for 15 minutes and some people would come up and say ‘that blew my mind, I learned more in this afternoon than I have in 10 years’. Someone else would say ‘you didn’t do anything, you suck’, because I was really about the stream of consciousness and trying to say ‘listen you don’t need to pay me to do jumping jacks, we all know how to do jumping jacks, everyone knows how to practise a sidekick or to do a jab. Without being facetious, there’s kenesiological, physiological and psychological education required in order to know where to hit and how to move your body properly but you could practise that by yourself.

My whole seminar and teaching system took on more of a self-exploration, mentorship, personally and amongst my students – it is a very cerebral approach.

“The SPEAR™ system is the only system that fits around our physiology”

 

Do you think that you’ve gained more than you initially thought you would?

Absolutely, it’s changed my life several times. It put me in situations, confrontations and meetings. If you’d asked me when I was 15/16 whether I would be opening the world’s largest combatives training premises in the US and our clients would include the US Department of Defence I probably would have said ‘yeah that sounds cool’, because I had that attitude anyway, that whatever’s supposed to happen will happen.

Have I grown personally? Of course, I’ve travelled around the world numerous times and met some really cool people, some of the best fighters, interviewed people who have been in the most challenging and horrific situations and survived them and shared their insights with me.

Because I’ve had to present to audiences from departments of psychology at major hospitals to closed door briefs for military professionals, I couldn’t be winging it or making shit up. We’ve done stuff from the Department of Defence to Gavin DeBecker to Victoria Hospital in Montreal, which has a very well-known psychology department. If you look at those different fields, I’d be wearing a suit on one day and ACUs in another meeting, a pair of slacks in another meeting, jeans somewhere else, so very often I stop and I look back and I’m invigorated by the things I’ve done.

There are a lot of systems that require students to train for a long time before they can use it, how long with SPEAR™?

The SPEAR™ system is the only system that fits around our physiology. That means that everybody turns up to a seminar or a class with the hard wiring for the programme already built-in, so part of the training, they already know how to do!

This is what’s confusing to a lot of people who read an article and look at a picture and go ‘why would you want to flinch in a fight?’ I always tell them that if they’d bothered to explore the next level, ‘you don’t want to flinch’ but your body flinches when you are surprised and the most dangerous moment in a fight is, of course, a violently surprising moment and that’s going to trigger a flinch – that’s applicable to a pro-MMA fighter, a soldier, a cop or a citizen going about their daily life.

Part of our research is the conversion of the flinch and not the flinch itself. It’s a big area of confusion. You usually get that confusion from people who have an unconscious or conscious investment in how they look, not how they do. If you look at the PDF files on our website for the new training centre the slogan is ‘It’s not who’s right, it’s who’s left’.

Can you tell us about the unique training methods of the SPEAR™ System?

TB: S.P.E.A.R.™ stands for Spontaneous – Protection – Enabling – Accelerated – Response

What we’ve done is create – based on classical and Pavlovian conditioning models – conditioning drills based on over a decade of research analysing how attacks happen.

We use what we call Primary Initiation Attacks, where we look at how different sectors and segments of a fight must transpond – because we’re dealing with humans. It’s almost like how you would build body armour. You would analyse what type of rounds the enemy has, where they are going to try and shoot you and how to stop that. So part of the research is ‘can we predict if two guys are standing in a bar in Scotland, having a fight, if they’re in this distance then the person can use their beer glass, their headbutt or a knee. But if they move past that they can’t headbutt or knee but they might push and use their beer glass or throw a punch.’

In other words, there are certain distances and basically how do you create probability in a confrontation. You break that down to ‘well if the person is standing left side forward, with their weight on their left leg and gesturing with their left hand they’re not going to kick you with their left leg. At the end of the day you can’t guarantee anything but you can predict movements and if the movement is sudden and aggressive, we can predict that we’re going to flinch.

Now with the flinch response, there’s two or three that we focus on from physiological research, but then the field opens because there’s a certain ‘black box’ concept determining what response is made. The black box is a metaphor that I stole from Coach Greg Glassman of CrossFit – it is the unknowable, it’s the magic. Its when you look at a phenomenon happening, and you know its happening, but we don’t know why, can’t explain why this happens but we think we may know why.

What we’ve noticed in studies with Law Enforcement scientists, specifically forensics, is that there’s almost always trauma on the hands and forearms in front of an initial assault, so there could be a gunshot wound, a knife wound or even somebody going through a window in a car – there’s always trauma on the forearms.

So what we’ve done through deductive logic is said that the first one and a half things that hit this person (from a bullet to a knife to windscreen-glass) is blocked by either their forearms or their hands because of the flinch mechanism.

That’s the black box – how awesomely fast is your flinch system if, before you can hit the glass on the window if your car has just hit another car, that you’ve got your hands up that fast to protect the head. How fast is it if a guy’s moving in with a knife? Whether or not you lost the fight, there’s always trauma to the front of your forearms and your hands. That trauma had to happen before you turned your back or were killed … correct?

When you look at that, what we’ve done is spend a lot of time analysing that and looking at videos of people flinching and then doing drills that generate our own flinches. We don’t’ teach people how to flinch but say ‘trust the flinch, your body’s going to flinch away from danger and depending on the proximity of the attack your hands are going to come up to protect your head – what we call the ‘command centre’ in the system.

Some how the black box, the survival system, does its best to get those hands going to intercept the incoming from hitting your command centre.

With regard to the attacks, do you look at a pattern of attacks or have a general set?

No, like everything we do, it’s based on the scenario and we reverse engineer everything from the scenario. If I was teaching taxi drivers, the primary scenario that a taxi driver is going to have is someone wanting to steal their cab, a carjacking whilst they’re sitting in their car or it’ll be a mugging from behind their seat in their car, but the key realisation is that, sitting in their car, they’re not likely to get into a kickboxing match.

We look at people, look at the scenarios they’re likely to find themselves in and try to prioritise them and then look at the probability of attack in that scenario.

Martial artists who are focused on self-defence in general practise altogether too many different techniques. I’m a big fan of BJ Penn and was just in his camp in Hawaii, helping him prepare for his match with Sean Sherk. BJ uses our High Gear™ impact reduction suit and they brought me out to work on the ground and pound phase. So here’s a guy that’s a Jujitsu wizard. His nickname is the Prodigy, but the bottom line is that he could be in a fight with George St Pierre or Matt Hughes and you won’t see the 500 different things he knows.

You’ll see a guard, you’ll see an attempt at chokes and arm bars and triangles. There’s a handful of things and so I guess what I’m getting at is that if we start from the scenario instead of ‘I want to master Jujitsu’ it should be ‘I want to master ground fighting in the context of an MMA event’, maybe I only need to practise 6 things and get really good at them.

That’s how we approach self-defence, it’s not that we’re going to practise 500 moves and then we’ll start doing realistic self-defence which is how a lot of schools operate. In my school it was interesting, as all of my students had to do three months of serious scenario based self-defence before they could go to a grappling class, a kickboxing class or a boxing class. In other words, we did everything in reverse order.

We said ‘you came here to learn to defend yourself. First we’re going to teach you how to stun and run and protect yourself because if you don’t win your fight you’re not going to show up at classes again are you?’

The flinch conversion happens on two levels. First of all, the psychological level and secondly, there’s the kenesiological, anatomical and physiological levels. So there’s a part of the startle flinch conversion that is done through classical Pavlovian conditioning, where we do stuff in the air, through a field of resistance meaning slight to moderate tension with a role-play partner.

Then we do things at speed through our Ballistic Micro-Fight(TM) model. Everything is done the same way where we’re replicating the targets and the intensity in what we’re doing and we’re conditioning responses but what we pioneered is working on the primal and the protective phase of self-defence, not just the tactical or the most effective biomechanic.

But in the SPEAR™ system, we talk about primal, protective and tactical versions of all of the possible responses, acknowledging that emotional, psychological, perception and awareness factors will impact your actual response in a real, sudden assault.

Why do you use HIGH GEAR™ , how did you progress things to the point where you needed to actually wear this gear during scenario-training?

What we’ve done that is very different from all of the gear out there is that we’ve built it with an impact reduction property, so that you can actually feel what’s going on. You can get knocked out in our gear, you can get winded and worse if you’re not using it properly. What we did was realise that in terms of street self-defence, there’s a lot you can’t practise if you don’t have the equipment on. What we did was build something that allows athletes to practise tactics that they couldn’t otherwise without risk of injury – basically we tell people that if they’re practising “pulling their shots” or “not hitting” that they’re not practising.

What High Gear™ allows you to do is to make contact to targets that are really moving. You can do stuff in a bar, you can do stuff in a bed, you can do stuff at an ATM. You can go into real-world environments and run training – you can really create a scenario at a level that no-one could achieve before.

Obviously you’ve reached a stage where you’re happy with the HIGH GEAR™ design, can you see yourself developing it further?

Yeah, we’re working on all sorts of new things. We’ve developed a special fire retardant training-projectile hood for the LEO and military community so that they can practise their live fire with training munitions.

We’re coming up with four or five design concepts in the works that will help isolate certain skill concepts, we’re always looking at new foams and fabrics to make the suit lighter and more dynamic. Right now it’s pretty awesome. Last week I was out with BJ Penn. These MMA guys are using the suit, they’re rolling around with it just going ‘oh my God this is awesome’.

How did you find the people to actually help you develop such a suit?

Now it’s easy, now that we’re a company people actually call us. Back in the day it was like ‘who the hell are we going to get to make this?’

There was a seminar out in Memphis Tennessee. We were doing Frankenstein gear at the time. We had the Supersafe helmet from Japan, baseball arm guards, hockey gauntlets, Taekwondo chest guard and one of my students said ‘wouldn’t it be cool if we had just our own suit and didn’t have to do a mishmash.’ I was like ‘yeah but how do you make a suit?’

If things are meant to happen you get certain signs that are put in front of you. One day I had the idea in my head, I had sketched it and then I bumped into some guy who knew a company that was designing a new Taekwondo chest guard and it was a really different design. They were working with different plastics and moulds so I told them about my idea and they built the first chest guard and head gear. I kept it for posterity as it would never have worked but we had our first non-functioning prototypes. About a year later one of my student’s fathers was President of CCM. I used to live in Montreal and CCM makes all the professional hockey gear.

We went in and had a professional engineer in the meeting and had these guys come up with some prototypes. Through them, I met some other people and CCM ended up having to pull away from the job due to other business. I was left with a functional prototype and to cut a long story short, one of the guys I was introduced to who used to make hockey gloves through CCM had a guy in his shop named Jaque Bourgoise, who he said was a master of the R&D side. I told him what was wrong with the suit and he built by hand a functioning prototype that we tested and I’ve been with him for over a decade now.

What are your goals with regard to building the Personal Defence Readiness™ (PDR) team?

The P.D.R. Programme is basically a philosophical approach to teaching self-defence. As pioneers in the emotional, psychological, and behavioural aspects of self-defence, what we’ve recognised is what unites all human beings on the planet is the physiological side of things.

I can have in a course, soldiers, cops, police trainers, martial arts instructors, people from the P.D.R. group and the rest from an eclectic group of people who all came together and who were all able to do every single drill; there was no interference because P.D.R. (Personal Defence Readiness) is about just that, Personal Defence Readiness, because philosophically, you’re not your style when you’re being attacked. Whether it’s a mugging, a home invasion, an attempted rape, you’re not Taekwondo subject getting attacked, you’re not a Jujitsu subject getting attacked; your style may or may not enhance your survivability at that moment you’ve got to weather the ambush, you’ve got to orient on the attack, you’ve got to have psychological tools to get through it and then, and only then, maybe your system is going to have an application.

I think that the UFC and the MMA have shown that most fighting systems don’t have an application in a real fight and maybe it is the mental toughness and the tenacity that one learns through a good martial arts system…but it is rarely the 500 moves you were practising that gets you through the fight.

“we’re making the planet a safer place one person, one instructor at a time”

More usually, it is you saying ‘no way is this happening now’ – it’s about will, not skill.

That’s the P.D.R. philosophy, what we’ve then done with the P.D.R. team is try to find like-minded instructors who have a conscience and accountability, who recognise that they’re there to help the citizens in their community and some of those citizens may or may not be martial artists. It’s about embracing the research and seeing that this system is rooted in true behavioural reality and physiological reality.

We make a joke with people who argue about our stuff because we have people who say ‘my instructor says the flinch is this’, we say ‘okay, no worries, this research on human beings doesn’t apply to X-Men and some martial artists.’ For these people to think that physiology or neurology or brain stem function and so on doesn’t apply to them is quite outlandish.

We’re not here trying to get people to wear our uniform and buy our karate kid headbands, we’re just saying ‘look, we happen to be the company that started this and we pioneered a lot of this research and it’s an open source. You can get this information on our website, you can go to any of our P.D.R. affiliate workshops and get varying degrees of this knowledge, based on their experience with us, but it’s all based on behaviour and genetics’.

We’re just trying to help the world become safer. That might seem grandiose to some people. What’s important is that we’re not trying to get people to stop going to martial arts schools. I just did this interview at the Arnold Schwarzenegger event. I was talking in front of hundreds of people doing a demo saying ‘you need to go to a martial arts school to learn certain tools and the style that you pick should resonate with your personality, but that doesn’t mean that you’re learning pure realistic street self-defence’.

The joke I always make is that you can go and study traditional and classic dancing, Ballet, Jazz and Freestyle, Samba and Waltz, but a specialist in those dances doesn’t mean that you can go out to a club with your girlfriend and dance to a U2 song. You start doing ballet in a rock club, you’re going to get thrown out on your head, especially if you’re a guy. That’s the issue here, and with the P.D.R. programme, we’re making the planet a safer place one person, one instructor at a time.

About mattsylvester

Father of two beautiful daughters and married to the beautiful Karen, Matthew has been reading and writing fantasy and science fiction since he first read the Hobbit at the age of 7. Matthew was Features Editor, Technical Consultant and regular columnist for magazines such as ‘Fighters’, ‘Combat’, ‘TKD & Korean Martial Arts’ and ‘Traditional Karate’. These are the four leading martial arts magazines in the United Kingdom. He is also the author of the critically acclaimed 'Practical Taekwondo: Back to the Roots', which has been sold around the world. With regard to his martial arts background he has been studying martial arts since 1991. In 1995 he hosted Professor Rick Clark of the ADK and since then has been studying pressure points and their uses in the martial arts and on the street (initially as a Special Constable and as a Door Supervisor). All of this practical hands-on experience means that he is uniquely placed to write fight scenes that are not only plausible but some of which are based on personal or anecdotal experience. Matthew has had a number of short stories published by Fringe Works, KnightWatch Press, Anderfam Press and Emby Press.

Discussion

2 thoughts on “Tony Blauer – It’s not who’s right, it’s who’s left

  1. The poor guy with the hat probably has to learn how to flinch..

    Cheers
    Peter

    Like

    Posted by Peter Mainhoffer | May 29, 2012, 12:37 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Taekwondo Is Effective For A Self Defense Program: Why Taekwondo Is More Effective Than A Reality Based Self Defense Course (Part 5) | White Dragon Dojang - September 30, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow Matthew Sylvester on WordPress.com

Categories

Supporters

%d bloggers like this: